Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Work clothing and cold sensitivity among poultry workers in Thailand: differences between subgroups

  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
  • University of Oulu
  • UiT - The Arctic University of Norway
  • Mahidol University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives. Cold-related adversities among poultry workers in Thailand vary by subgroup, but the impact of clothing insulation (Icl) is not well understood. Methods. The authors interviewed 283 poultry workers and compared Icl values across subgroups, adjusting for confounding factors. Results. The average worksite temperature was 3.8 °C, with average Icl of 1.23 clo. After adjustments, Icl was 0.38 clo lower in office workers compared to other job categories, and 0.11 clo lower in workers with the highest body mass index (37.5) compared to those with the lowest (15.6). Icl was 0.08 clo higher in the oldest workers (age 57 years) compared to the youngest (age 18 years), 0.07 clo higher among weekly alcohol consumers compared to non-consumers, 0.06 clo higher in women than in men and 0.04 clo higher among those engaged in light compared to heavy work. Perceiving temperatures >0 °C as cold was associated with an increase of 0.22 clo in Icl. Conclusions. Office workers should wear more clothing. Relatively high Icl values observed in some subgroups suggest sensitivity to cold, warranting further individual examination to determine optimal Icl levels. Targeting preventive measures at vulnerable worker groups in Thailand’s poultry industry could reduce the burden of cold-related harm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1216-1224
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Thailand
  • cold work
  • occupation
  • poultry industry
  • thermal insulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Work clothing and cold sensitivity among poultry workers in Thailand: differences between subgroups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this