Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Use of I Think as Different Types of Markers in English Conversations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This research investigated the use of I think as different types of markers by Thai learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) to determine whether the use of I think by Thai intermediate- and advanced-level EFL participants showed any significant differences. The types of markers and the functions of I think used by the Thai EFL participants were identified, as were their inappropriate uses of I think. In total, 72 Thai EFL participants were involved in this research, and dyadic English conversations were conducted for data collection. The statistical results illustrated that the Thai intermediate-level EFL participants used I think significantly more often than the Thai advanced-level EFL participants, particularly as a stance marker (SM). By contrast, the Thai advanced-level EFL participants used I think significantly more often as a pragmatic marker (PM) and as a politeness marker (PoM) than the Thai intermediate-level EFL participants. The Thai intermediate-level EFL participants mainly used the SM I think to express a subjective evaluative stance, while the Thai advanced-level EFL participants used I think across a broader range of markers and functions. Their inappropriate uses of I think are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number145
JournalLanguages
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • I think
  • Thai EFL learners
  • interlanguage pragmatics
  • politeness marker
  • pragmatic function
  • pragmatic marker
  • stance marker

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of I Think as Different Types of Markers in English Conversations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this