Abstract
This research investigated the use of I think as different types of markers by Thai learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) to determine whether the use of I think by Thai intermediate- and advanced-level EFL participants showed any significant differences. The types of markers and the functions of I think used by the Thai EFL participants were identified, as were their inappropriate uses of I think. In total, 72 Thai EFL participants were involved in this research, and dyadic English conversations were conducted for data collection. The statistical results illustrated that the Thai intermediate-level EFL participants used I think significantly more often than the Thai advanced-level EFL participants, particularly as a stance marker (SM). By contrast, the Thai advanced-level EFL participants used I think significantly more often as a pragmatic marker (PM) and as a politeness marker (PoM) than the Thai intermediate-level EFL participants. The Thai intermediate-level EFL participants mainly used the SM I think to express a subjective evaluative stance, while the Thai advanced-level EFL participants used I think across a broader range of markers and functions. Their inappropriate uses of I think are also discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 145 |
| Journal | Languages |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2025 |
Keywords
- I think
- Thai EFL learners
- interlanguage pragmatics
- politeness marker
- pragmatic function
- pragmatic marker
- stance marker
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of I Think as Different Types of Markers in English Conversations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver