Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Severe intensive care unit–acquired hypernatraemia: Prevalence, risk factors, trajectory, management, and outcome

  • Severe Hypernatremia Assessment, Resolution, and Eradication (SHARE) Investigators
  • Austin Hospital
  • Monash University
  • Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
  • Faculty of Medicine
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Department of Critical Care
  • University of Melbourne

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Severe intensive care unit–acquired hypernatraemia (ICU-AH) is a serious complication of critical illness. However, there is no detailed information on how this condition develops. Objectives: The objective of this study was to study the prevalence, risk factors, trajectory, management, and outcome of severe ICU-AH (≥155 mmol·L−1). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a 40-bed ICU in a university-affiliated hospital. Assessment of sodium levels, factors associated with severe ICU-AH, urinary electrolyte measurements, water therapy, fluid balance, correction rate, and delirium was made. Results: We screened 11,642 ICU admissions and identified 109 patients with severe ICU-AH. The median age was 57 years, 63% were male, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 64 (52; 80). On the day of ICU admission, 64% of patients were ventilated; 71% received vasopressors, and 22% had acute kidney injury. The median peak sodium level was 158 (156; 161) mmolL−1 at a median of 4 (1; 11) days after ICU admission. Only eight patients (7%) had urine sodium measurement (median concentration: 17 mmol·L−1). On the day of peak hypernatraemia, 80% of patients were unable to drink due to invasive ventilation; 34% were on diuretics; 25% had fever, and 50% did not receive hypotonic fluids. When available, the median electrolyte-free water clearance was −1.1 L (−1.7; −0.5), representing half of the urine output. After peak hypernatraemia, the correction rate was −2.8 mmol·L−1 per day (95% confidence interval: [-2.9 to −2.6]) during the first 3 d. Conclusions: Severe hypernatraemia occurred in the setting of inability to drink, near-absent measurement of urinary free water losses, diuretic therapy, fever, renal impairment, and near-absent or limited or delayed water administration. Correction was slow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-318
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Care and Resuscitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Correction rate
  • Electrolyte-free water clearance
  • Hypernatraemia
  • ICU-acquired hypernatraemia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Severe intensive care unit–acquired hypernatraemia: Prevalence, risk factors, trajectory, management, and outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this