Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Relationship between neointimal regrowth and mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis with or without supplementary intravascular radiation

  • Yoshihiro Morino
  • , Thosaphol Limpijankit
  • , Yasuhiro Honda
  • , Manoon Somrantin
  • , Ron Waksman
  • , Heidi N. Bonneau
  • , Paul G. Yock
  • , Gary S. Mintz
  • , Peter J. Fitzgerald
  • Stanford University Medical Center
  • Dept. of Med., Washington Hosp. Ctr.
  • Highlands Consulting Inc.
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated whether neointimal regrowth is related to the mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions both with and without adjunct intravascular brachytherapy. From the WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial) cohort, 54 ISR patients (192Ir, 29; placebo, 25) were treated with nonrepeat stenting percutaneous interventions (excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, and/or balloon angioplasty) prior to 192Ir or placebo therapy. Using Simpson's method, serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses (pre- and posttreatment and 6-month follow-up) were analyzed to obtain stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volumes that were then adjusted for stent length to create stent, lumen, and IH volume indexes. In the placebo group, the acute reduction of neointima (1.6 ± 1.4 mm3/mm) was counteracted by intimal regrowth (2.1 ± 1.7 mm3/mm). The amount of intimal regrowth correlated directly with the intimal reduction due to the intervention (r = 0.76; P < 0.001), but not with the amount of additional stent expansion. In the 192Ir-treated group, intimal regrowth was significantly less than in the placebo group (-0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.7 mm3/mm; P < 0.001) despite a similar initial intimal reduction (1.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 1.4 mm3/mm; P = NS), No correlation was found between intimal reduction at the time of the procedure and intimal regrowth in the 192Ir group. In this study, neointimal regrowth following treatment of ISR lesions correlates directly with the extent of acute intimal volume reduction, but not with the extent of additional stent expansion. This relation is not seen in ISR segments treated with radiation, where intimal regrowth is substantially inhibited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-167
Number of pages6
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brachytherapy
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Radiation
  • Stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between neointimal regrowth and mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis with or without supplementary intravascular radiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this