Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel

  • Ann Lii Cheng
  • , Deepak Amarapurkar
  • , Yee Chao
  • , Pei Jer Chen
  • , Jean François Geschwind
  • , Khean L. Goh
  • , Kwang Hyub Han
  • , Masatoshi Kudo
  • , Han Chu Lee
  • , Rheun Chuan Lee
  • , Laurentius A. Lesmana
  • , Ho Yeong Lim
  • , Seung Woon Paik
  • , Ronnie T. Poon
  • , Chee Kiat Tan
  • , Tawesak Tanwandee
  • , Gaojun Teng
  • , Joong Won Park
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • National Taiwan University College of Medicine
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
  • University of Malaya
  • Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • Kinki University School of Medicine
  • University of Ulsan College of Medicine
  • Universitas Indonesia
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Singapore General Hospital
  • Southeast University
  • National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually receive transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapies with intermediate and advanced-stage disease. However, intermediate-stage HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated TACE and there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the criteria for repeating or stopping TACE treatment. In July 2012, an Expert Panel Opinion on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC) was re-convened in Shanghai in an attempt to provide a consensus on the practice of TACE, particularly in regard to evaluating TACE 'failure'. To that end, current clinical practice throughout Asia was reviewed in detail including safety and efficacy data on TACE alone as well as in combination with targeted systemic therapies for intermediate HCC. This review summarizes the evidence discussed at the meeting and provides expert recommendations regarding the use of TACE for unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. A key consensus of the Expert Panel was that the current definitions of TACE failure are not useful in differentiating between situations where TACE is no longer effective in controlling disease locally vs. systemically. By redefining these concepts, it may be possible to provide a clearer indication of when TACE should be repeated and more importantly, when TACE should be discontinued.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-183
Number of pages10
JournalLiver International
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Combination therapy
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Sorafenib
  • TACE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this