Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Political semiotics of national campaign posters and pictorial representation: Thailand's 2011 general elections

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2011 Thai general election was seen by many Thai political analysts as a watershed moment that would hopefully be the tipping point of socio-political reconciliation in the drawn out political struggle that has characterized Thai politics since 2005. The highly contested nature of Thai politics becomes salient when viewing campaign posters pictorial and linguistic content. The most controversial of which was the "Vote No" campaign taken on by the For Heaven and Earth Party, which is a political party nominally associated with Thailand's conservative People's Alliance for Democracy. This study seeks to unwrap and decode the semiotics of this party's political campaign posters in Thailand's 2011 general election by providing cultural context to the application of multimodal discourse analysis and critical semiotics framework. I will argue that the "Vote No" campaign and its campaign posters depicting politicians as animals is a continuing political discourse of conservative Buddhist philosophers/scholars that reaches back to the 1980s. Furthermore, the "Vote No" campaign seeks to create dissonance and reinstate conservative rule via monarchial and/or military intervention by creating political deadlock thereby undermining democratic rights and rule by the exercising of democratic rights of voting, thus disenfranchising citizens by their own hand.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-296
Number of pages28
JournalSemiotica
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Keywords

  • Campaign posters Thailand
  • Election posters
  • Political semiotics
  • Thailand election
  • Thailand politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Political semiotics of national campaign posters and pictorial representation: Thailand's 2011 general elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this