Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix

  • Alfonso Dueñas-González
  • , Juan J. Zarbá
  • , Firuza Patel
  • , Juan C. Alcedo
  • , Semir Beslija
  • , Luis Casanova
  • , Pittayapoom Pattaranutaporn
  • , Shahid Hameed
  • , Julie M. Blair
  • , Helen Barraclough
  • , Mauro Orlando
  • National Autonomous University of Mexico UNAM
  • Medical Center
  • Eli Lilly Interamerica Inc.
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
  • National Institute of Oncology
  • University of Sarajevo
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasticas
  • Siriraj Hospital
  • Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Center
  • Eli Lilly Australia Pty Limited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

448 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether addition of gemcitabine to concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and as adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin improves progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years compared with current standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and Methods: Eligible chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naive patients with stage IIB to IVA disease and Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 were randomly assigned to arm A (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 125 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy [XRT] 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, followed by brachytherapy [BCT] 30 to 35 Gy in 96 hours, and then two adjuvant 21-day cycles of cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or to arm B (cisplatin and concurrent XRT followed by BCT only; dosing same as for arm A). Results: Between May 2002 and March 2004, 515 patients were enrolled (arm A, n = 259; arm B, n = 256). PFS at 3 years was significantly improved in arm A versus arm B (74.4% v 65.0%, respectively; P = .029), as were overall PFS (log-rank P = .0227; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), overall survival (log-rank P = .0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), and time to progressive disease (log-rank P = .0012; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in arm A than in arm B (86.5% v 46.3%, respectively; P < .001), including two deaths possibly related to treatment toxicity in arm A. Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by BCT and adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy improved survival outcomes with increased but clinically manageable toxicity when compared with standard treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1678-1685
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this