Abstract
Non-coplanar VMAT spares critical organs with short delivery time while maintaining PTV coverage. Due to the growth patterns of pituitary adenoma, the beam angle selection step was simplified by finding the optimal couch angles and number of arcs. The 2 clinical cases with difference PTV sizes were selected to study the results of dose distribution between coplanar and non-coplanar techniques. Later, couch angles were varied from 30° to 90° and 270° to 330° with a 15° interval. The numbers of arcs were varied from 3 to 4 arcs. Then, the selected protocol was applied to 5 pituitary adenoma patients. It was found that 90° and 270° couch angle showed the highest scores. However, these beams passed directly through the body, so the second couch angles of 75° and 285° were selected instead. For number of arcs optimization, 3-arc plan and 4-arc plan demonstrated a similar score. However, the 3-arc plan illustrated an obviously shorter treatment time. After the selection was proven to the 5 patients, there were 4 patients who passed the criteria, while 1 patient did not pass the hippocampal planning criteria. In conclusion, the suggested couch angles were 75° and 285°. The optimal number of arcs for pituitary adenoma was 3 arcs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 012059 |
| Journal | Journal of Physics: Conference Series |
| Volume | 1248 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Jun 2019 |
| Event | 18th Asia-Oceania Congress of Medical Physics, AOCMP 2018 and 16th South-East Asia Congress of Medical Physics, SEACOMP 2018 - Bangsar South, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Duration: 11 Nov 2018 → 14 Nov 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimization of couch angles and number of arcs in non-coplanar VMAT for pituitary adenomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver