TY - GEN
T1 - On the performance of MIPv6 and FMIPv6 based on real IPv6 applications over IEEE 802.11g testbeds
AU - Visoottiviseth, Vasaka
AU - Ngamtura, Pairat
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Mobility support in IPv6 networks (MIPv6) and Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6) are already released as RFCs for many years. While the former focuses on maintaining the network connections when a mobile node handovers across subnets, the latter is built based on the former concept, but focuses on reducing the packet loss and latency inherent to the handover process. Performance study of both protocols was conducted, but most of them are based on simulations or numerical analysis. Therefore, in this paper we present a set of experiments with real implementations of MIPv6 and FMIPv6 for Linux operating system, and their performance evaluation based on real applications. We create a real IEEE 802.11g wireless testbed and run real IPv6 applications, such as FTP and the video streaming. Jperf measurement tool is also used to measure the UDP performance as well. Performance metrics we observe are throughput, jitter, and handover latency. For video streaming, the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) is used to evaluate.
AB - Mobility support in IPv6 networks (MIPv6) and Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6) are already released as RFCs for many years. While the former focuses on maintaining the network connections when a mobile node handovers across subnets, the latter is built based on the former concept, but focuses on reducing the packet loss and latency inherent to the handover process. Performance study of both protocols was conducted, but most of them are based on simulations or numerical analysis. Therefore, in this paper we present a set of experiments with real implementations of MIPv6 and FMIPv6 for Linux operating system, and their performance evaluation based on real applications. We create a real IEEE 802.11g wireless testbed and run real IPv6 applications, such as FTP and the video streaming. Jperf measurement tool is also used to measure the UDP performance as well. Performance metrics we observe are throughput, jitter, and handover latency. For video streaming, the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) is used to evaluate.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78651241699
U2 - 10.1109/ISCIT.2010.5665176
DO - 10.1109/ISCIT.2010.5665176
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78651241699
SN - 9781424470105
T3 - ISCIT 2010 - 2010 10th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies
SP - 1217
EP - 1222
BT - ISCIT 2010 - 2010 10th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies
T2 - 2010 10th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, ISCIT 2010
Y2 - 26 October 2010 through 29 October 2010
ER -