Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Local Excision Versus Total Mesorectal Excision for Clinical Stage I (cT1–cT2) Rectal Cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Early rectal cancer (cT1 and cT2) has been increasingly detected due to the wide application of colorectal cancer screening program. Total mesorectal excision (TME) is a gold standard for the treatment of this early stage disease. However, postoperative complications, unfavorable functional outcomes, and risk of permanent stoma following TME are not uncommon. In contrast, local excision (LE) is less invasive and more tolerable to frail patients and those with severe co-morbidities. Simultaneously, both functional and sexual outcomes following LE were not disturbed and the patient could avoid abdominoperineal resection. The drawback of LE is leaving perirectal lymph node yielding unknown actual pathological nodal staging—which partly leads to more recurrence comparing to TME. This article aimed to review the current evidence of TME and LE in early rectal cancer, to critically review the role and consequence of chemoradiation in LE, and to update ongoing trials on this subject.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Colorectal Cancer Reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Local excision
  • Outcome
  • Radiation
  • Rectal cancer
  • Surgery
  • Total mesorectal excision
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Local Excision Versus Total Mesorectal Excision for Clinical Stage I (cT1–cT2) Rectal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this