Abstract
In Asia, it is still controversial whether it is safe to inject a contaminated animal bite wound with a foreign protein such as equine or human rabies immune globulin, even though this is recommended by the World Health Organization. A prospective study of 114 severe animal bite wounds which were injected with equine or human rabies immune globulin revealed an overall incidence of gross infection of 11·4%. No matched control group of patients bitten by animals whose wounds were not injected with immune globulin could be studied in this environment with a high prevalence of canine rabies. The incidence of wound infection in lacerations inflicted by sharp objects and sutured under local anaesthesia was therefore studied prospectively in 100 Thai patients from a similar socio-economic milieu; it was found to be 13%. Wound infection was more common in animal bites and lacerations of the lower extremities. It is concluded that injecting a properly cleansed bite wound with equine or human rabies immune globulin is a safe practice and should be performed whenever there is a possibility that the biting animal might have rabies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 86-88 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1992 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is injection of contaminated animal bite wounds with rabies immune globulin a safe practice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver