Abstract
Hormonal therapy is the standard treatment for metastatic prostatic carcinoma. The conventional surgical or medical androgen ablation therapy seems to have a similar response. Despite a higher response of CAB compared to conventional castration in metastatic disease, the controversy of survival benefit remains unsolved. Immediate treatment should be given in metastatic disease particularly in patients who have minimal metastases. In patients who have progression after CAB, antiandrogens should be withdrawn. The choices of optimal therapies for prostate cancer depend not only on the survival but also the quality of life and cost effect. Thus, the critical factors for approaching prostate cancer are appropriate patient selection and stratification. Implicit with this approach should maximize benefit from maximal androgen ablation therapy for patients who are likely to profit from it. Finally, the development of experiments, clinical trials, and novel therapeutic strategies may provide better management for prostate cancer in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 192-204 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 1999 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Hormonal Ablation Therapy
- Metastatic Prostatic Carcinoma
- Review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hormonal ablation therapy for metastatic prostatic carcinoma: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver