Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Glutamic acid and alanine spacer is not necessary for removal of MFα-1 signal sequence fused to the human growth hormone produced from Pichia pastoris

  • Mahidol University
  • Rangsit University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human growth hormone (hGH) cDNA was synthesised using codons preferred by Escherichia coli, except for the first 20 amino acids, which were changed to that preferred by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) overlapping approach was employed to create synthetic hGH without glutamic acid-alanine (glu-ala), or with one and two glu-ala spacers (hGH, hGH1 and hGH2, respectively). The necessity of a glu-ala spacer in the cleavage of S. cerevisiae alpha mating factor-1 (MFα-1) secretion signal from the synthetic hGH was also investigated. Three types of hGH constructs were integrated into P. pastoris genome, the zeocin-resistant transformants were selected and expression of hGH was determined. A 22-kDa band of secreted hGH was further determined by N-terminal peptide sequencing. The result suggested that the removal of glu-ala from the hGH1 and hGH2 was not efficient and only the hGH construct showed the complete cleavage of the signal sequence, giving a similar N-terminus as the mature hGH. hGH expression was optimized to increase the yield of the protein from the hGH construct (no glu-ala) to 190 mg/l from a 10-ml induction medium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-498
Number of pages6
JournalWorld Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Glu-ala repeats
  • Human growth hormone
  • PCR and Pichia pastoris
  • α-Mating factor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Glutamic acid and alanine spacer is not necessary for removal of MFα-1 signal sequence fused to the human growth hormone produced from Pichia pastoris'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this