Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Globalization and peremptory norms in international law: From Westphalian to global constitutionalism?

  • Bryn Mawr College

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Constitutionalism in international law is shifting from a Westphalian to a global framework. This shift is driven by globalist social forces who are ideologically committed to neo-liberalism and have an interest in free trade. They have succeeded in making free trade the next peremptory norm in international law after non-aggression, and have pre-empted the emergence of countervailing peremptory norms on Human Rights and environmental imperatives. There is no clear juridical authority to pronounce between calls for justice from a Westphalian frame, and property claims enshrined in global supranational institutions. The emergence of such authority in global constitutionalism, will depend upon both bargaining power and ideological alternative to neo-liberalism. The territorial state is still an important site for mobilizing the necessary bargaining power to reshape global authority.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-353
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Politics
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2004
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Global constitutionalism
  • Peremptory norms
  • Supranationalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Globalization and peremptory norms in international law: From Westphalian to global constitutionalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this