Abstract
Constitutionalism in international law is shifting from a Westphalian to a global framework. This shift is driven by globalist social forces who are ideologically committed to neo-liberalism and have an interest in free trade. They have succeeded in making free trade the next peremptory norm in international law after non-aggression, and have pre-empted the emergence of countervailing peremptory norms on Human Rights and environmental imperatives. There is no clear juridical authority to pronounce between calls for justice from a Westphalian frame, and property claims enshrined in global supranational institutions. The emergence of such authority in global constitutionalism, will depend upon both bargaining power and ideological alternative to neo-liberalism. The territorial state is still an important site for mobilizing the necessary bargaining power to reshape global authority.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 341-353 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Politics |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Global constitutionalism
- Peremptory norms
- Supranationalism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Globalization and peremptory norms in international law: From Westphalian to global constitutionalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver