Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a regional analysis of COMMODORE in China, South-East Asia, and Russia

  • Bin Jiang
  • , Jian Li
  • , Ligen Liu
  • , Xin Du
  • , Hao Jiang
  • , Jianda Hu
  • , Xiaoxi Zeng
  • , Taishi Sakatani
  • , Masanori Kosako
  • , Yaru Deng
  • , Larisa Girshova
  • , Sergey Bondarenko
  • , Lily Wong Lee Lee
  • , Archrob Khuhapinant
  • , Elena Martynova
  • , Nahla Hasabou
  • , Jianxiang Wang
  • Peking University International Hospital
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Tongren Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School Of Medicine
  • Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University
  • Peking University Peopleʼs Hospital
  • Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University
  • Astellas China Investment Co.,Ltd
  • Astellas Pharma Inc., Japan
  • Almazov National Medical Research Centre
  • Pavlov University
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
  • Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The COMMODORE study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy (SC) treatment in a predominantly Asian population with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated(mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML); here we present an exploratory analysis of the study stratified by region (China, South-East Asia and Russia). COMMODORE was a Phase 3, open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter trial. There were 151, 50, and 33 patients in the China, South-East Asia, and Russia cohorts, respectively. Patients treated with gilteritinib had prolonged median overall survival (OS) versus SC-treated patients in all regions (China: 10.0 vs. 5.7 months, HR [95% CI]: 0.614 [0.385, 0.981]; South-East Asia: 7.8 vs. 4.7 months, HR [95% CI]: 0.887 [0.427, 1.843]; Russia: 8.8 vs. 2.6 months, HR [95% CI]: 0.271 [0.111, 0.662]). Improvements in event-free survival (EFS) were observed in the gilteritinib versus SC arms across all cohorts (China: 2.1 vs. 0.8 months; HR [95% CI]: 0.645 [0.427, 0.974]; South-East Asia 2.4 vs. < 0.1 months; HR [95% CI]: 0.415 [0.208, 0.830]; Russia: 6.2 vs. 0.6 months; HR [95% CI]: 0.221 [0.080, 0.614]). Complete remission rates were numerically higher in the gilteritinib versus SC arm across all three regions. Gilteritinib compared with SC treatment improved OS and EFS with no new safety signals, reinforcing the known efficacy and safety profile of gilteritinib in patients with R/R FLT3mut+ AML, and affirming the clinical benefit of gilteritinib in three different patient populations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03182244.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1563-1575
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Hematology
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a regional analysis of COMMODORE in China, South-East Asia, and Russia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this