TY - GEN
T1 - Enhanced Adversarial Drift Detection for MLOps Feature Monitoring
AU - Begum, Nusrat
AU - Yamchote, Phaphontee
AU - Amornbunchornvej, Chainarong
AU - Noraset, Thanapon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 IEEE.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Machine learning models in production suffer from distribution drift, where evolving input features degrade performance. Existing unsupervised detectors signal that drift occurred, but not which features drifted or how severe the shift is. This paper proposes Enhanced Adversarial Drift Detection (EADD), extending the D3 discriminative detector with three contributions: (1) an Adaptive Sequential Permutation Test (ASPT) for rigorous drift confirmation, cutting permutation budget by 90-95%; (2) SHAP-based drift localisation and a Drift Severity Index (DSI) for feature-level diagnosis and severity quantification; and (3) benchmarking against seven unsupervised detectors on synthetic and real-world streams. EADD achieves full drift type coverage (4/4) with zero false alarms on synthetic data, detects drift on three of four annotated INSECTS datasets, and outperforms D3 on detection delay in all three detected cases (up to 8× faster). SHAP attribution reaches perfect accuracy (P@k = R@k = 1.0) on controlled synthetic scenarios. On autocorrelated streams, EADD produces zero false alarms versus D3's 54.6 (p =0.0101, Mann-Whitney U).
AB - Machine learning models in production suffer from distribution drift, where evolving input features degrade performance. Existing unsupervised detectors signal that drift occurred, but not which features drifted or how severe the shift is. This paper proposes Enhanced Adversarial Drift Detection (EADD), extending the D3 discriminative detector with three contributions: (1) an Adaptive Sequential Permutation Test (ASPT) for rigorous drift confirmation, cutting permutation budget by 90-95%; (2) SHAP-based drift localisation and a Drift Severity Index (DSI) for feature-level diagnosis and severity quantification; and (3) benchmarking against seven unsupervised detectors on synthetic and real-world streams. EADD achieves full drift type coverage (4/4) with zero false alarms on synthetic data, detects drift on three of four annotated INSECTS datasets, and outperforms D3 on detection delay in all three detected cases (up to 8× faster). SHAP attribution reaches perfect accuracy (P@k = R@k = 1.0) on controlled synthetic scenarios. On autocorrelated streams, EADD produces zero false alarms versus D3's 54.6 (p =0.0101, Mann-Whitney U).
KW - Drift Detection
KW - Feature Drift
KW - Machine Learning
KW - MLOps
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105045236032
U2 - 10.1109/JCSSE68839.2026.11596765
DO - 10.1109/JCSSE68839.2026.11596765
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105045236032
T3 - Proceedings - 23rd International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, JCSSE 2026
SP - 684
EP - 689
BT - Proceedings - 23rd International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, JCSSE 2026
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 23rd International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, JCSSE 2026
Y2 - 24 June 2026 through 27 June 2026
ER -