Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effort to breathe with various spontaneous breathing trial techniques

  • Michael C. Sklar
  • , Karen Burns
  • , Nuttapol Rittayamai
  • , Ashley Lanys
  • , Michela Rauseo
  • , Lu Chen
  • , Martin Dres
  • , Guang Qiang Chen
  • , Ewan C. Goligher
  • , Neill K.J. Adhikari
  • , Laurent Brochard
  • , Jan O. Friedrich
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science
  • Università degli Studi di Foggia
  • Université René-Descartes
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
  • University Health Network University of Toronto
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are designed to simulate conditions after extubation, and it is essential to understand the physiologic impact of different methods. Objectives: Weconducted a systematic review and pooled measures reflecting patient respiratory effort among studies comparing SBT methods in a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science from inception to January 2016 to identify randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials reporting physiologic measurements of respiratory effort (pressure-time product) or work of breathing during at least twoSBTtechniques. Secondaryoutcomes includedthe rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), and effort measured before and after extubation. The quality of physiologic measurement and research design was appraised for each study. Outcomes were analyzed using ratio of means. Measurements and Main Results: Among 4,138 citations, 16 studies (n = 239) were included. Compared with T-piece, pressure support ventilation significantly reduced work by 30% (ratio of means [RoM], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.86), effort by 30% (RoM, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82), and RSBI by 20%(RoM, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.75-0.86). Continuous positive airway pressure had significantly lower pressure-time product by 18% (RoM, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.999) compared with T-piece, and reduced RSBI by 16% (RoM, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95). Studies comparing SBTs with the postextubation period demonstrated that pressure support induced significantly lower effort and RSBI; T-piece reduced effort, but not the work, compared with postextubation. Work, effort, and RSBI measured while intubated on the ventilator with continuous positive airway pressure of 0 cm H2O were no different than extubation. Conclusions: Pressure support reduces respiratory effort compared with T-piece. Continuous positive airway pressure of 0 cm H2O and T-piece more accurately reflect the physiologic conditions after extubation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1485
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume195
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Pressure time product
  • Weaning
  • Work of breathing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effort to breathe with various spontaneous breathing trial techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this