Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Using Noninsulated Microneedle Radiofrequency Alone versus in Combination with Polynucleotides for Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles

  • Yuri Yogya
  • , Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha
  • , Supisara Wongdama
  • , Yanisorn Nanchaipruek
  • , Chadakan Yan
  • , Sarawalai Rakchart
  • Department of Dermatology
  • Siriraj Hospital
  • Innovative Skin and Laser Surgery (iSKY) Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: A few studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of noninsulated radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) to treat periorbital wrinkles in Asian patients. Recently, wound healing accelerators, polynucleotides (PNs), have received attention in wound management. However, their efficacy and safety have not been fully elucidated following RFNM. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninsulated RFMN for periorbital wrinkles and the synergistic effect of PNs after RFMN. Methods: Thirty subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V and facial wrinkles (Fitzpatrick grades I and II) were enrolled. All volunteers were treated over the entire face with noninsulated RFMN for three sessions at 2-week intervals. The left and right sides of each patient’s face were randomly assigned to receive PNs (treatment group) or normal saline solution (control group). The indentation and maximum depth of wrinkles were objectively measured using Antera 3D. Subjective self-evaluations were obtained at baseline, 2 weeks after the third treatment, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the final treatment. In addition, pain scores, immediate reactions, and other adverse effects were evaluated. Results: Twenty-nine subjects completed the treatment protocol. Most presented with grade II wrinkling (69%). At 2-month follow-up, Antera 3D image analysis revealed faster improvement for the treatment group. At 6-month follow-up, the majority of subjects reported an improvement of 25–75% in their periorbital wrinkles. The average pain score was 2.2 out of 10. No serious adverse events (infection, pigmentary alteration, persistent erythema, or scarring) were observed. Conclusions: Noninsulated RFMN is safe and effective for treating periorbital wrinkles and can be used as a modality for transdermal drug delivery. Topical polynucleotides as an adjunctive treatment provide additional benefits for periorbital wrinkle treatment. Trial Registration Number: TCTR20201105007.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1133-1145
Number of pages13
JournalDermatology and Therapy
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Microneedling
  • Periorbital wrinkles
  • Polynucleotides
  • Radiofrequency
  • Transdermal drug delivery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Safety of Using Noninsulated Microneedle Radiofrequency Alone versus in Combination with Polynucleotides for Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this