TY - JOUR
T1 - Early beta-blocker exposure and association with brain injury biomarkers following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
T2 - A TRACK-TBI study
AU - the TRACK-TBI investigators
AU - Wongsripuemtet, Pattrapun
AU - Ohnuma, Tetsu
AU - Temkin, Nancy
AU - Barber, Jason
AU - Komisarow, Jordan
AU - Manley, Geoffrey T.
AU - Hatfield, Jordan
AU - Treggiari, Miriam
AU - Colton, Katharine
AU - Sasannejad, Cina
AU - Chaikittisilpa, Nophanan
AU - Grandhi, Ramesh
AU - Laskowitz, Daniel T.
AU - Mathew, Joseph P.
AU - Hernandez, Adrian
AU - James, Michael L.
AU - Raghunathan, Karthik
AU - Miller, Joseph B.
AU - Vavilala, Monica S.
AU - Goldstein, Ben
AU - Krishnamoorthy, Vijay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Intensive Care Society 2025
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Background: Beta-blockers have been studied for potential benefits in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the association between early beta-blocker exposure and brain injury biomarkers following moderate-severe TBI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Patients ⩾ 17 years with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–12) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Early beta-blocker exposure was defined as administration within the first 72 h of admission. The primary outcome was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3 post-injury. Biomarkers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP). Propensity-weighted models analyzed the association between beta-blocker exposure and biomarker levels. Results: Among 450 patients, 31 (7%) received beta-blockers (BB+). The mean (SD) age of BB+ patients was 51.4 (16.2) years, compared to 39.5 (17.0) years for unexposed patients (BB−). BB+ group was associated with a decreased NSE level on day 3 (ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.96, p = 0.026), although this was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p = 0.13). For secondary outcomes, UCH-L1 levels increased on day 5 in the BB+ group (ratio = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12- 2.36, p = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment (p = 0.55). The NSE level on day 14 decreased in the BB+ group (ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30–0.66, p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (p = 0.005). Conclusions: There was no association between early beta-blocker exposure and the primary outcome which was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3. In exploratory analysis, we found that early beta-blocker may associated with decreased NSE level on day 14. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of propensity-weighted analysis to identify associations, direct clinical practice changes cannot be recommended. However, the significant association with NSE level warrants further investigation through prospective studies or randomized controlled trials to confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of early beta-blocker exposure on neuronal cellular injury.
AB - Background: Beta-blockers have been studied for potential benefits in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the association between early beta-blocker exposure and brain injury biomarkers following moderate-severe TBI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Patients ⩾ 17 years with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–12) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Early beta-blocker exposure was defined as administration within the first 72 h of admission. The primary outcome was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3 post-injury. Biomarkers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP). Propensity-weighted models analyzed the association between beta-blocker exposure and biomarker levels. Results: Among 450 patients, 31 (7%) received beta-blockers (BB+). The mean (SD) age of BB+ patients was 51.4 (16.2) years, compared to 39.5 (17.0) years for unexposed patients (BB−). BB+ group was associated with a decreased NSE level on day 3 (ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.96, p = 0.026), although this was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p = 0.13). For secondary outcomes, UCH-L1 levels increased on day 5 in the BB+ group (ratio = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12- 2.36, p = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment (p = 0.55). The NSE level on day 14 decreased in the BB+ group (ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30–0.66, p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (p = 0.005). Conclusions: There was no association between early beta-blocker exposure and the primary outcome which was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3. In exploratory analysis, we found that early beta-blocker may associated with decreased NSE level on day 14. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of propensity-weighted analysis to identify associations, direct clinical practice changes cannot be recommended. However, the significant association with NSE level warrants further investigation through prospective studies or randomized controlled trials to confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of early beta-blocker exposure on neuronal cellular injury.
KW - Beta-blockers
KW - biomarkers
KW - critical care
KW - traumatic brain injury
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013350122
U2 - 10.1177/17511437251349680
DO - 10.1177/17511437251349680
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105013350122
SN - 1751-1437
VL - 26
SP - 423
EP - 434
JO - Journal of the Intensive Care Society
JF - Journal of the Intensive Care Society
IS - 4
ER -