Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Asian Countries: A Questionnaire Survey

  • Hidenori Tanaka
  • , Shiro Oka
  • , Akiko Shiotani
  • , Mitsushige Sugimoto
  • , Hidekazu Suzuki
  • , Yuji Naito
  • , Osamu Handa
  • , Tadakazu Hisamatsu
  • , Shin Fukudo
  • , Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
  • , Satoshi Motoya
  • , Naohisa Yahagi
  • , Satoru Yamaguchi
  • , Francis K.L. Chan
  • , Sun Young Lee
  • , Baiwen Li
  • , Tiing Leong Ang
  • , Murdani Abdullah
  • , Maria Carla Tablante
  • , Varayu Prachayakul
  • Shinji Tanaka
  • Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Kawasaki Medical School
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital
  • Tokai University School of Medicine
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
  • Kyorin University School of Medicine
  • Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Graduate School of Medicine
  • Sapporo Kosei General Hospital
  • Keio University School of Medicine
  • Dokkyo Medical University
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Konkuk University School of Medicine
  • Shanghai General Hospital
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Universitas Indonesia, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
  • University of Santo Tomas Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic and therapeutic methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) have advanced; however, they may be inaccessible worldwide, and their widespread use is challenging. This questionnaire survey investigates the current status of diagnosis and treatment of early-stage CRC in Asian countries. Methods: Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 213 doctors at different institutions in 8 countries and regions. The questionnaire consisted of 39 questions on the following four topics: noninvasive diagnosis other than endoscopy (6 questions), diagnosis by magnification and image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) including artificial intelligence (AI) (10 questions), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), proper use among other therapeutic methods (11 questions), and pathologic diagnosis and surveillance (12 questions). Results: Although 101 of 213 respondents were affiliated with academic hospitals, there were disparities among countries and regions in the dissemination of advanced technologies, such as IEE, AI, and ESD. The NICE classification is widely used for the diagnosis of colorectal tumors using IEE, while the JNET classification with magnification was used in countries such as Japan (65/70, 92.9%) and China (16/22, 72.7%). Of the 211 respondents, 208 (98.6%) assumed that en bloc resection should be achieved for carcinomas, and 180 of 212 (84.9%) believed that ESD was the most suitable in cases with a diameter larger than 2 cm. However, colorectal ESD is not widespread in countries such as Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia. Conclusion: The promotion of advanced technologies and education should be continual to enable more people to benefit from them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-68
Number of pages7
JournalDigestion
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal tumor
  • En bloc resection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Asian Countries: A Questionnaire Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this