Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction to: Once-Daily versus Twice Daily Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies (Drugs, (2019), 79, 18, (1947-1962), 10.1007/s40265-019-01217-7)

  • Chulalongkorn University
  • Thammasat University Hospital
  • Ramathibodi Hospital
  • Samrejvittaya School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Table 1 Characteristics of the included observational studies. The row for study Jelassi et al. (2011) [28], where the Observational Period for ER-Tac reads June 2007–March 2010a and for IR-Tac reads N/A. The row should read: Observational period for ER-Tac June 2007–March 2010a. Where the footnote a indicates that Information was reported only for the overall population. Page 4, left-hand column, first sentence of first new paragraph, which currently reads: ‘To evaluate publication bias, a funnel plot was constructed by plotting the MD of the primary outcome against the standard error (SE) of the MD.’ Should read: ‘To evaluate publication bias, a funnel plot was constructed by plotting the RR of the primary outcome against the standard error (SE) of the logarithm of RR.’ Page 10, left-hand column, second sentence of second paragraph, which currently reads: ‘Only the I2 of Scr reported within 6 months post-KT was higher than 25% (58%), indicating a moderate variance in the observed BPAR rate among various included studies.’ Should read: ‘Only the I2 of Scr reported within 6 months post-KT was higher than 25% (58%), indicating a moderate variance in the observed Scr among various included studies.’ The original article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1963
Number of pages1
JournalDrugs
Volume79
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Once-Daily versus Twice Daily Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies (Drugs, (2019), 79, 18, (1947-1962), 10.1007/s40265-019-01217-7)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this