Abstract
The authors regret that the Animal ethical approval statement that appears in the original article is incorrect. The correct statement is as follows: The study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB), Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (COA no. 005/2556). This study complied with all of the principles set forth in The Ethical Principles for the Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes which were issued by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) in 1999. The original article has been corrected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2243 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Parasitology Research |
| Volume | 122 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: First study of topical selamectin efficacy for treating cats naturally infected with Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi under field conditions (Parasitology Research, (2019), 118, 4, (1289-1297), 10.1007/s00436-019-06248-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver