Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of paediatric basic life support guidelines endorsed by member councils of Resuscitation Council of Asia

  • Gene Y. Ong
  • , Hiroshi Kurosawa
  • , Takanari Ikeyama
  • , June Dong Park
  • , Poomiporn Katanyuwong
  • , Olivia C.F. Reyes
  • , En Ting Wu
  • , Kam Lun Ellis Hon
  • , Ian K. Maconochie
  • , Lindsay N. Shepard
  • , Vinay M. Nadkarni
  • , Kee Chong Ng
  • KK Women's And Children's Hospital
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital
  • Aichi Childrens Health and Medical Center
  • Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
  • Seoul National University College of Medicine
  • Philippine General Hospital
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong Children’s Hospital
  • North West London Pathology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Paediatric cardiac arrest outcomes, especially for infants, remain poor. Due to different training, resource differences, and historical reasons, paediatric cardiac arrest algorithms for various Asia countries vary. While there has been a common basic life support algorithm for adults by the Resuscitation Council of Asia (RCA), there is no common RCA algorithm for paediatric life support. We aimed to review published paediatric life support guidelines from different Asian resuscitation councils. Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed for published paediatric basic and advanced life support guidelines from January 2015 to June 2023. Paediatric representatives from the Resuscitation Council of Asia were sought and contacted to provide input from September 2022 till June 2023. Results: While most of the components of published paediatric life support algorithms of Asian countries are similar, there are notable variations in terms of age criteria for recommended use of adult basic life support algorithms in the paediatric population less than 18 years old, recommended paediatric chest compression depth targets, ventilation rates post-advanced airway intra-arrest, and first defibrillation dose for shockable rhythms in paediatric cardiac arrest. Conclusion: This was an overview and mapping of published Asian paediatric resuscitation algorithms. It highlights similarities across paediatric life support guidelines in Asian countries. There were some differences in components of paediatric life support which highlight important knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation science. The minor differences in the paediatric life support guidelines endorsed by the member councils may provide a framework for prioritising resuscitation research and highlight knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100506
JournalResuscitation Plus
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Life support care
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice guidelines as topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of paediatric basic life support guidelines endorsed by member councils of Resuscitation Council of Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this