TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative analysis of fault discrimination algorithms on sensitivity to high impedance busbar faults
AU - Hossain, Monir
AU - Leevongwat, Ittiphong
AU - Rastgoufard, Parviz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/11/13
Y1 - 2017/11/13
N2 - Presently there is not one differential protection characteristic which is self-sufficient to detect all possible busbar faults accurately. Particularly, during close-in external fault, current transformer (CT) saturation creates high operating current which can cause mal-operation of differential relays. As a result, a fault discriminator is necessary to supervise the differential schemes to prevent undesired tripping operation. Most of the existing fault discrimination algorithms have been proven as an efficient external fault detector; however, they suffer from lack of sensitivity to high impedance internal faults. This paper presents a comparative analysis on sensitivity of three existing fault discrimination algorithms including Phase Angle Comparison Algorithm (PACA), Rate of Change of Differential Algorithm (ROCODA), and Alienation Coefficient Algorithm (ACA). Fault simulations were performed using a three-bus test system. The results documented in this paper show that the degree of sensitivity of ROCODA and ACA are similar and much higher than PACA. The comparative analysis presented in this paper can be employed as a useful guideline for selection of an appropriate protection scheme for busbar systems.
AB - Presently there is not one differential protection characteristic which is self-sufficient to detect all possible busbar faults accurately. Particularly, during close-in external fault, current transformer (CT) saturation creates high operating current which can cause mal-operation of differential relays. As a result, a fault discriminator is necessary to supervise the differential schemes to prevent undesired tripping operation. Most of the existing fault discrimination algorithms have been proven as an efficient external fault detector; however, they suffer from lack of sensitivity to high impedance internal faults. This paper presents a comparative analysis on sensitivity of three existing fault discrimination algorithms including Phase Angle Comparison Algorithm (PACA), Rate of Change of Differential Algorithm (ROCODA), and Alienation Coefficient Algorithm (ACA). Fault simulations were performed using a three-bus test system. The results documented in this paper show that the degree of sensitivity of ROCODA and ACA are similar and much higher than PACA. The comparative analysis presented in this paper can be employed as a useful guideline for selection of an appropriate protection scheme for busbar systems.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85039950644
U2 - 10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107244
DO - 10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107244
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85039950644
T3 - 2017 North American Power Symposium, NAPS 2017
BT - 2017 North American Power Symposium, NAPS 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2017 North American Power Symposium, NAPS 2017
Y2 - 17 September 2017 through 19 September 2017
ER -