Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cellular Flocculation Driven by Concentrated Polymer Brush-Modified Cellulose Nanofibers with Different Surface Charges

  • Chiaki Yoshikawa
  • , Keita Sakakibara
  • , Punnida Nonsuwan
  • , Miwako Shobo
  • , Xida Yuan
  • , Kazuaki Matsumura
  • Natl. Inst. for Materials Science
  • Natl. Inst. Adv. Indust. Sci. T.
  • Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effect of the surface charge of concentrated polymer brush (CPB)-grafted cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) on HepG2 cell flocculation. Four polyelectrolytes, poly(p-styrenesulfonic acid sodium salt) (PSSNa), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA), and poly([(2-methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride) (PMTAC), were grafted onto the CNF surface via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization to form CNF-CPBs. The floc size of HepG2 cells depended on the surface charge of CNF-CPBs, where the anionic CNF-PSSNa formed larger flocs than CNF-PAA; due to the electrostatic repulsive forces, CNF-CPBs with a lower ζ-potential yielded smaller floc sizes. Contrastingly, the cytotoxic cationic CNF-PDMAEMA and CNF-PMTAC limited the floc size growth. Thus, appropriate electrostatic interactions are essential for floc formation and improved cell function in three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems. Interestingly, while developing a novel 3D cell culture system, we reveal that colloidal flocculation theory is the driving mechanism behind this unique phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3186-3197
Number of pages12
JournalBiomacromolecules
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cellular Flocculation Driven by Concentrated Polymer Brush-Modified Cellulose Nanofibers with Different Surface Charges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this