TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of the association between early comprehensive geriatric assessment and outcomes in hip fracture care for older people
AU - HIPCARE investigators
AU - Paes, V. Mazarello
AU - Ting, A.
AU - Masters, J.
AU - Paes, M. V.I.
AU - Graham, S. M.
AU - Costa, M. L.
AU - Costa, Matt
AU - Tabu, Irewin
AU - Pandey, Dipendra
AU - Joshi, Sunil Kumar
AU - Sharma, Vijay
AU - Jagnoor, Jagnoor
AU - Sa-Ngasoongsong, Paphon
AU - La, Quang
AU - Chinh, Nguyen Duc
AU - Pham, Cuong V.
AU - Achten, Juul
AU - Appelbe, Duncan
AU - Grant, Richard
AU - Massa, Sofia
AU - Bolbocean, Corneliu
AU - Petrou, Stavros
AU - Keene, David
AU - Palagyi, Anna
AU - Armstrong, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Mazarello Paes et al.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Aims Performance indicators are increasingly used to improve the quality of healthcare provided to hip fracture patients. Joint care, under orthopaedic surgeons and physicians with an interest in older patients, is one of the more common indicators of high-quality care. In this systematic review, we investigated the association between ‘comprehensive geriatric assessment’ and patient outcomes following hip fracture injury. Methods In total, 12 electronic databases and other sources were searched for evidence, and the methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed.The protocol for this suite of related systematic reviews was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417515). Results A total of 24,591 articles were reviewed, and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, involving a total of 25,363 patients aged over 60 years with a hip fracture. There were five randomized clinical trials, three quasi-experimental studies, two non-randomized parallel group control trials, 22 pre-/post-intervention studies, and seven retrospective cohort studies, conducted between January 1992 and December 2021. The timing and content of a comprehensive geriatric assessment was ill-defined in many studies and care pathways were heterogeneous, which precluded meta-analysis of the data. Early comprehensive geriatric assessment was associated with improved outcomes in 31 of the 36 (86%) patient-reported outcomes, including improved mobility (acute/ long-term), functional status, and better quality of life. In total, 155 out of 219 (70.78%) clinical outcomes derived from hospital records showed a positive association with early comprehensive geriatric review, including reduced preoperative time and length of hospital stay, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality. Conclusion Early comprehensive geriatric assessments after hip fracture in older people is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and better clinical outcomes such as reduced incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, and mortality. Standardization of the definitions of ‘early’ and ‘comprehensive’ geriatric assessments and consistent reporting of care pathway models would improve future evidence synthesis.
AB - Aims Performance indicators are increasingly used to improve the quality of healthcare provided to hip fracture patients. Joint care, under orthopaedic surgeons and physicians with an interest in older patients, is one of the more common indicators of high-quality care. In this systematic review, we investigated the association between ‘comprehensive geriatric assessment’ and patient outcomes following hip fracture injury. Methods In total, 12 electronic databases and other sources were searched for evidence, and the methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was assessed.The protocol for this suite of related systematic reviews was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023417515). Results A total of 24,591 articles were reviewed, and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review, involving a total of 25,363 patients aged over 60 years with a hip fracture. There were five randomized clinical trials, three quasi-experimental studies, two non-randomized parallel group control trials, 22 pre-/post-intervention studies, and seven retrospective cohort studies, conducted between January 1992 and December 2021. The timing and content of a comprehensive geriatric assessment was ill-defined in many studies and care pathways were heterogeneous, which precluded meta-analysis of the data. Early comprehensive geriatric assessment was associated with improved outcomes in 31 of the 36 (86%) patient-reported outcomes, including improved mobility (acute/ long-term), functional status, and better quality of life. In total, 155 out of 219 (70.78%) clinical outcomes derived from hospital records showed a positive association with early comprehensive geriatric review, including reduced preoperative time and length of hospital stay, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower mortality. Conclusion Early comprehensive geriatric assessments after hip fracture in older people is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and better clinical outcomes such as reduced incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, and mortality. Standardization of the definitions of ‘early’ and ‘comprehensive’ geriatric assessments and consistent reporting of care pathway models would improve future evidence synthesis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008038876
U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1
DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1255.R1
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105008038876
SN - 2049-4394
VL - 107B
SP - 595
EP - 603
JO - Bone and Joint Journal
JF - Bone and Joint Journal
IS - 6
ER -