TY - GEN
T1 - 3D finite element study of biomechanical performances of short implant supporting fixed prosthesis
AU - Sanpanyawai, Pompon
AU - Inglam, Samroeng
AU - Chaichanasiri, Ekachai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - All-on-four oral rehabilitation by placing 2 tilted splint with 2 normal angulation implants, is one of an effective treatment but operator's experience are more required. Using short implant (not greater than 6 mm.) instead of tilted implant placement may interest. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performances of short implant for supporting fixed prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Finite element models were designed into 3 conditions. In anterior region, two 4.1×8 mm. implants were used. In posterior region, a couple of short implant (4.1×6 mm. and 4.8×6 mm.) were used in condition 1 and 2, respectively. While condition 3 (original All-on-four) 2 pieces of 4.1×8 mm. implant were placed with 30° angulation. Both axial and oblique loading directions were applied with a magnitude of 150 N. at the first molar area. Strain, stress, strain energy density (SED), and implant displacement were evaluated. Results revealed that the strain, stress, and displacement from each condition were not greater than 4000 microstrains (bone's maximum strain value before resorption), 104 MPa (bone's yield strength), and 5 micrometers (physiologic movement of implant), respectively. The results indicated that marginal bone would not be affected. The application of short implant could safe to the bone in biomechanical aspect.
AB - All-on-four oral rehabilitation by placing 2 tilted splint with 2 normal angulation implants, is one of an effective treatment but operator's experience are more required. Using short implant (not greater than 6 mm.) instead of tilted implant placement may interest. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performances of short implant for supporting fixed prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Finite element models were designed into 3 conditions. In anterior region, two 4.1×8 mm. implants were used. In posterior region, a couple of short implant (4.1×6 mm. and 4.8×6 mm.) were used in condition 1 and 2, respectively. While condition 3 (original All-on-four) 2 pieces of 4.1×8 mm. implant were placed with 30° angulation. Both axial and oblique loading directions were applied with a magnitude of 150 N. at the first molar area. Strain, stress, strain energy density (SED), and implant displacement were evaluated. Results revealed that the strain, stress, and displacement from each condition were not greater than 4000 microstrains (bone's maximum strain value before resorption), 104 MPa (bone's yield strength), and 5 micrometers (physiologic movement of implant), respectively. The results indicated that marginal bone would not be affected. The application of short implant could safe to the bone in biomechanical aspect.
KW - all-on-four
KW - biomechanics
KW - finite element analysis
KW - maxilla
KW - short impant
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85015642593
U2 - 10.1109/IECBES.2016.7843534
DO - 10.1109/IECBES.2016.7843534
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85015642593
T3 - IECBES 2016 - IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences
SP - 669
EP - 673
BT - IECBES 2016 - IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, IECBES 2016
Y2 - 4 December 2016 through 8 December 2016
ER -